Register :: Log in :: Profile :: Mail   

Your Ad Here

israel planning NUCLEAR RAID on iran

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    LVC Home // Israel Corner
Author Message
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:11 pm    Post subject: israel planning NUCLEAR RAID on iran Reply with quote
Israel Planning Nuke Raid on Iran Uranium Enrichment Sites
January 07th, 2007 | Category: Web Story

Source: London Times

6 Jan 2007

Israel has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons. Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear “bunker-busters”, according to several Israeli military sources.

The attack would be the first with nuclear weapons since 1945, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Israeli weapons would each have a force equivalent to one-fifteenth of the Hiroshima bomb.

Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout.

“As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources.

The plans, disclosed to The Sunday Times last week, have been prompted in part by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad’s assessment that Iran is on the verge of producing enough enriched uranium to make nuclear weapons within two years.

Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock.

However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said.

Israeli and American officials have met several times to consider military action. Military analysts said the disclosure of the plans could be intended to put pressure on Tehran to halt enrichment, cajole America into action or soften up world opinion in advance of an Israeli attack.

Some analysts warned that Iranian retaliation for such a strike could range from disruption of oil supplies to the West to terrorist attacks against Jewish targets around the world.

Israel has identified three prime targets south of Tehran which are believed to be involved in Iran’s nuclear programme:

—Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges are being installed for uranium enrichment

—A uranium conversion facility near Isfahan where, according to a statement by an Iranian vice-president last week, 250 tons of gas for the enrichment process have been stored in tunnels

—A heavy water reactor at Arak, which may in future produce enough plutonium for a bomb Israeli officials believe that destroying all three sites would delay Iran’s nuclear programme indefinitely and prevent them from having to live in fear of a “second Holocaust”.

The Israeli government has warned repeatedly that it will never allow nuclear weapons to be made in Iran, whose president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has declared that “Israel must be wiped off the map”.

Robert Gates, the new US defence secretary, has described military action against Iran as a “last resort”, leading Israeli officials to conclude that it will be left to them to strike.

Israeli pilots have flown to Gibraltar in recent weeks to train for the 2,000-mile round trip to the Iranian targets. Three possible routes have been mapped out, including one over Turkey.

Air force squadrons based at Hatzerim in the Negev desert and Tel Nof, south of Tel Aviv, have trained to use Israel’s tactical nuclear weapons on the mission. The preparations have been overseen by Major General Eliezer Shkedi, commander of the Israeli air force.

Sources close to the Pentagon said the United States was highly unlikely to give approval for tactical nuclear weapons to be used. One source said Israel would have to seek approval “after the event”, as it did when it crippled Iraq’s nuclear reactor at Osirak with airstrikes in 1981.

Scientists have calculated that although contamination from the bunker-busters could be limited, tons of radioactive uranium compounds would be released.

The Israelis believe that Iran’s retaliation would be constrained by fear of a second strike if it were to launch its Shehab-3 ballistic missiles at Israel.

However, American experts warned of repercussions, including widespread protests that could destabilise parts of the Islamic world friendly to the West.

Colonel Sam Gardiner, a Pentagon adviser, said Iran could try to close the Strait of Hormuz, the route for 20 percent of the world’s oil.

Some sources in Washington said they doubted if Israel would have the nerve to attack Iran. However, Dr Ephraim Sneh, the deputy Israeli defence minister, said last month: “The time is approaching when Israel and the international community will have to decide whether to take military action against Iran.”
Back to top
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
i have known of this plan for over a year now and it is fucking scary that a major news source would run the story, because that makes it seem that it may be coming soon.

remember last year when bush refused to rule out using low-yeild tactical nuclear munitions in battle?
Back to top
corey michael
Not a Newbie
Not a Newbie


Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 77
Location: Gulf Coast USA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jusdeadphunky wrote:
i have known of this plan for over a year now and it is fucking scary that a major news source would run the story, because that makes it seem that it may be coming soon.

remember last year when bush refused to rule out using low-yeild tactical nuclear munitions in battle?


I also recall the talks of all of the aerial attacks on Iran that were floating around the blogosphere about a year ago. Israel says jump...
Back to top
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
corey michael wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
i have known of this plan for over a year now and it is fucking scary that a major news source would run the story, because that makes it seem that it may be coming soon.

remember last year when bush refused to rule out using low-yeild tactical nuclear munitions in battle?


I also recall the talks of all of the aerial attacks on Iran that were floating around the blogosphere about a year ago. Israel says jump...


it is getting to a point where the western world is no longer sticking up for israel. israel attacking iran with nukes the u.s. gave them may be worse than the u.s. attacking iran. how fucked up is this shit? iran boarders russia and both have mutual defensive treaties in place. if israel or the u.s. nukes iran, there is a strong possibility of the doomsday effect occuring.
Back to top
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
the other part of it is; that i personally feel the democrats are more bed partners with israel than the republicans.
Back to top
corey michael
Not a Newbie
Not a Newbie


Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 77
Location: Gulf Coast USA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jusdeadphunky wrote:
the other part of it is; that i personally feel the democrats are more bed partners with israel than the republicans.


Interesting. Regardless of who is more or less, the point is they are all in bed with Israel.
Back to top
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
corey michael wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
the other part of it is; that i personally feel the democrats are more bed partners with israel than the republicans.


Interesting. Regardless of who is more or less, the point is they are all in bed with Israel.


you are correct, all i am trying to say is don't put too much hope in the democrats blocking a war for israel.
Back to top
chevydriver1123
Known Associate
Known Associate


Joined: 17 Dec 2006
Posts: 441
Location: Newburgh New York

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
If it happends it will be the six day war all over again and who knows who else will join the fight
Back to top
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 7:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
chevydriver1123 wrote:
If it happends it will be the six day war all over again and who knows who else will join the fight


oh yea? i can read this several differnt ways so would you elaborate? i am leaning towards making it seem like it may not be that big of a deal.

this quite possibly trigger an exchange of nuclear weapons from several different nations that could lead to a nuclear holocaust. this threat is nothing to be thought of lightly.
Back to top
Post new topic   Reply to topic    LVC Home // Israel Corner All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Add to My Yahoo! Add to Google

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites Politics Blogs Politics