There are pretty much NO articles on John McCain, but consists primarily of articles bashing Obama.
It amazes me they are stooping to the level of bashing an opponent instead of notifying interested visitors on what THEY are all about. Maybe because they don't stand for anything worthy of people's support.
When someone goes to the webpage they get slapped in the face with everything that THEY think is wrong with Obama, but offer none of what THEY have to offer.
But here is the best part...
They have a online clock counting the number of days since Obama has been to Iraq. They make it a point to slam it down your throat that he hasn't been to Iraq in over 800 days and that this makes him a bad leader.
My question is, who is buying this bullshit they are selling?
They are challenging Obama's patriotism and ideals simply by the fact that he hasn't gone to a shit hole war zone that shouldn't have happened in the first place.
I haven't been to Iraq and I'm sure most civilians haven't, does that make us anti-Americans or poior leaders? Are they labeling everyone who hasn't visited Iraq, anti-American?
Excerpt from the site:
“Barack Obama has only visited Iraq once – and that was 871 days ago. Despite lacking the experience and leadership to be Commander-in-Chief, Obama has done shockingly little to educate himself firsthand about the war in Iraq. Instead, he displays an arrogant certainty gained on the campaign trail. How would Obama make informed judgments in the future when he has not seen the situation in Iraq since the surge began? Why does Obama readily agree to one-on-one negotiations with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, but decline one-on-one briefings in Baghdad with our military leaders? Obama’s failure to visit Iraq, listen and learn firsthand, and witness the surge’s progress demonstrates weak leadership that disqualifies him from being Commander in Chief.”