Register :: Log in :: Profile :: Mail   


ACLU
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    LVC Home // Conservative Corner
Author Message
joeyjock
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Dec 2006
Posts: 554
Location: Fort Lauderdale

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Whoa!!!
This is the Exact reason we're still in that country being picked off one by one by sunnis and shiites alike
...l. Saddam had NO bombs that were directed at us
we tried to find the evidence for 4 freakin' yrs!!!
You and I and the rest of the country were lied to my man big time
and until the rest of the country doesn't get over that fact we're gonna wallow in that quagmire forever
Back to top
exton
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 2825

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jasonkenna wrote:

Saddam had bombs that could have destroyed America. Both Republicans and Democrats said that. Are you forgeting the sattelite images of Iraq shoveling missles in and out of the country?


*sigh*

Saddam had no WMD's. None. That was established long ago.
Back to top
jasonkenna
Not a Newbie
Not a Newbie


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 64
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
exton wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:

Saddam had bombs that could have destroyed America. Both Republicans and Democrats said that. Are you forgeting the sattelite images of Iraq shoveling missles in and out of the country?


*sigh*

Saddam had no WMD's. None. That was established long ago.


Then what were those sattelite images of??
Back to top
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:

Maybe so, but like I said maybe they wouldnt know what to do without looking at NAMBLAS website, or knowing that The ACLU will always claim that that they are "mentally unstable" its just sick that groups like NAMBLA exist.


come on man. 99.9% of this statement is completely asinine.

you think that someone who wants to fuck a kid does not know how to with looking it up? give me a break...

you think that people who want to commit a crime research what to do once caught before doing the crime? come on...

you think that people who are truly mentally unstable and who can not be held accountable for their actions should be nailed to the cross if they fuck up?


mentally unstable people kill themselves most of the time, not others. Yes, you take a life, you give yours up, that simple. NAMBLA gives you tips to get away with the crime and how to defend your self if you get caught. Now I think someone with no prior knowedge of killings, would want to know how to do all that, and NAMBLA and The ACLU are more then willing to show them how.


right...

we have taken between 300k and 600k iraqi lives...you want to volunteer to be the first one to begin the process of making that right?


If I could, I would volunteer myself to make America win. We, as in america, have taken all those lives, the suicide bombers and such did. Now, that number would be higher had we not stepped in, and Saddam would still be in power, which means, that those thousands, could have been millions more.


omg

how old are you? 6 1/2

i think my 5 year old brother can think for himself better than you can.

if we would not have invaded a sovereign nation and sparked a civil war, there would be more people dead.

hahahahahahha

thanks for the laugh


So if we never over through Saddam, crime would go down is what you saying? Man, sounds like your more Pro-Iraq then Pro-American


wtf are you trying to say? "if we were never over saddam crime, would go down?"

what the hell is that supposed to mean?

i am against the destruction of innocent life for corporate gain, which obviously you support.


Oh Shut The Fuck Up, Typo, Big Fucking Deal. Through was supposted to be threw. overthrew. if we never overthrew Saddam, crime would go down is what I said. Anyway, no, i dont support that. What I do support is going to war with a country that threatens to bomb the american people.


where the fuck do you see anything that i wrote that would elude to my opinion being that if the u.s. did not commit an atrocity in iraq that crime would go down?

saddam had the capability to bomb america? what evidence do you have to support this claim?

more bad grammar...that is what i thought...what you are stating is complete bullshit so consider yourself in a hole that you can not dig out of.


Saddam had bombs that could have destroyed America. Both Republicans and Democrats said that. Are you forgeting the sattelite images of Iraq shoveling missles in and out of the country?


are you forgetting that all the intelligence they had was outdated and forged? did you forget that the administration knew this but decided that halliburton needed to steal our money so badly that they pushed them as if they were current and the false shit was true?
Back to top
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
not to mention that saddam posed a threat to no one
Back to top
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jasonkenna wrote:
exton wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:

Saddam had bombs that could have destroyed America. Both Republicans and Democrats said that. Are you forgeting the sattelite images of Iraq shoveling missles in and out of the country?


*sigh*

Saddam had no WMD's. None. That was established long ago.


Then what were those sattelite images of??


obviously not the wmd that you believe they represented.

it amazes me how fucking stupid some people are and how hard they will try to keep a lie alive.
Back to top
jasonkenna
Not a Newbie
Not a Newbie


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 64
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jusdeadphunky wrote:
not to mention that saddam posed a threat to no one


of course, no one but Iran, and everyone in Iraq, but other then that, no, he didnt pose a threat to anyone
Back to top
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
not to mention that saddam posed a threat to no one


of course, no one but Iran, and everyone in Iraq, but other then that, no, he didnt pose a threat to anyone


he didn't even put up a fight when the u.s. invaded. doesn't sound very threatening to me.

i applaud the u.s. for keeping the people of iraq safe from saddam. as we all know their lives now are so much better and saddam is not the one killing thousands of innocent iraqi civilians every month. good job jackasses for "supporting" the war.
Back to top
jasonkenna
Not a Newbie
Not a Newbie


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 64
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jusdeadphunky wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
not to mention that saddam posed a threat to no one


of course, no one but Iran, and everyone in Iraq, but other then that, no, he didnt pose a threat to anyone


he didn't even put up a fight when the u.s. invaded. doesn't sound very threatening to me.

i applaud the u.s. for keeping the people of iraq safe from saddam. as we all know their lives now are so much better and saddam is not the one killing thousands of innocent iraqi civilians every month. good job jackasses for "supporting" the war.


whatever, we're not even talking about The ACLU anymore, lol. Point is, I know they have the right to be here, but if i had my way, they would be gone, along with NAMBLA, i know im not the only one who belives that.
Back to top
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2071

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
not to mention that saddam posed a threat to no one


of course, no one but Iran, and everyone in Iraq, but other then that, no, he didnt pose a threat to anyone


he didn't even put up a fight when the u.s. invaded. doesn't sound very threatening to me.

i applaud the u.s. for keeping the people of iraq safe from saddam. as we all know their lives now are so much better and saddam is not the one killing thousands of innocent iraqi civilians every month. good job jackasses for "supporting" the war.


whatever, we're not even talking about The ACLU anymore, lol. Point is, I know they have the right to be here, but if i had my way, they would be gone, along with NAMBLA, i know im not the only one who belives that.


well it is good that you agree that they have the right to be here and in admitting that, if you had things your way you would trample the bill of rights, correct?
Back to top
jasonkenna
Not a Newbie
Not a Newbie


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 64
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jusdeadphunky wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:
jusdeadphunky wrote:
not to mention that saddam posed a threat to no one


of course, no one but Iran, and everyone in Iraq, but other then that, no, he didnt pose a threat to anyone


he didn't even put up a fight when the u.s. invaded. doesn't sound very threatening to me.

i applaud the u.s. for keeping the people of iraq safe from saddam. as we all know their lives now are so much better and saddam is not the one killing thousands of innocent iraqi civilians every month. good job jackasses for "supporting" the war.


whatever, we're not even talking about The ACLU anymore, lol. Point is, I know they have the right to be here, but if i had my way, they would be gone, along with NAMBLA, i know im not the only one who belives that.


well it is good that you agree that they have the right to be here and in admitting that, if you had things your way you would trample the bill of rights, correct?


Of course not. I would add another admendment saying that any group who advocates killing and raping children should be watched over and if it doesnt stop, then the group would be stopped.
Back to top
exton
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 2825

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jasonkenna wrote:
exton wrote:

*sigh*

Saddam had no WMD's. None. That was established long ago.


Then what were those sattelite images of??


Post the images. I'll give you my opinion.
Back to top
exton
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 2825

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
jasonkenna wrote:

whatever, we're not even talking about The ACLU anymore, lol. Point is, I know they have the right to be here, but if i had my way, they would be gone, along with NAMBLA, i know im not the only one who belives that.


You have no rational justification for that, though. Just a gut-level emotional reaction.
Back to top
jasonkenna
Not a Newbie
Not a Newbie


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 64
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
exton wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:
exton wrote:

*sigh*

Saddam had no WMD's. None. That was established long ago.


Then what were those sattelite images of??


Post the images. I'll give you my opinion.


look it up. It was all over the news. Not just Fox News either.
Back to top
jasonkenna
Not a Newbie
Not a Newbie


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 64
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
exton wrote:
jasonkenna wrote:

whatever, we're not even talking about The ACLU anymore, lol. Point is, I know they have the right to be here, but if i had my way, they would be gone, along with NAMBLA, i know im not the only one who belives that.


You have no rational justification for that, though. Just a gut-level emotional reaction.


Have you not been listing to me? The Curley case, The Lunsford case, those are just some of the more famous ones. Do the research. Everytime a child rapist gets in trouble, The ACLU supports them. They should be supporting the parents who lost a child!
Back to top
Post new topic   Reply to topic    LVC Home // Conservative Corner All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 7 of 9

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Add to My Yahoo!

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites